Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorIacopini, Matteo
dc.contributor.authorRavazzolo, Francesco
dc.contributor.authorRossini, Luca
dc.date.accessioned2020-09-17T06:17:12Z
dc.date.available2020-09-17T06:17:12Z
dc.date.issued2020-09-01
dc.identifier.issn1892-2198
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/2678134
dc.description.abstractThis paper proposes a novel asymmetric continuous probabilistic score (ACPS) for evaluating and comparing density forecasts. It extends the proposed score and defines a weighted version, which emphasizes regions of interest, such as the tails or the center of a variable’s range. A test is also introduced to statistically compare the predictive ability of different forecasts. The ACPS is of general use in any situation where the decision maker has asymmetric preferences in the evaluation of the forecasts. In an artificial experiment, the implications of varying the level of asymmetry in the ACPS are illustrated. Then, the proposed score and test are applied to assess and compare density forecasts of macroeconomic relevant datasets (US employment growth) and of commodity prices (oil and electricity prices) with particular focus on the recent COVID-19 crisis period.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherBI Norwegian Business Schoolen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesCAMP Working Paper Series;06/2020
dc.subjectasymmetric continuous probabilistic scoreen_US
dc.subjectasymmetric lossen_US
dc.subjectproper scoreen_US
dc.subjectdensity forecasten_US
dc.subjectpredictive distributionen_US
dc.subjectweighted scoreen_US
dc.subjectprobabilistic forcasten_US
dc.titleProper scoring rules for evaluating asymmetry in density forecastingen_US
dc.typeWorking paperen_US
dc.source.pagenumber33en_US


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel