Boom or gloom? Examining the Dutch disease in a two-speed economy
Working paper
Permanent lenke
http://hdl.handle.net/11250/196679Utgivelsesdato
2013Metadata
Vis full innførselSamlinger
Sammendrag
Traditional studies of the Dutch disease do not typically account for productiv-
ity spillovers between the booming energy sector and non-oil sectors. This study
identifies and quantifies these spillovers using a Bayesian Dynamic Factor Model
(BDFM). The model allows for resource movements and spending effects through
a large panel of variables at the sectoral level, while also identifying disturbances
to the real oil price, global demand and non-oil activity. Using Norway as a repre-
sentative case study, we find that a booming energy sector has substantial spillover
effects on the non-oil sectors. Furthermore, windfall gains due to changes in the
real oil price also stimulates the economy, but primarily if the oil price increase is
caused by global demand. Oil price increases due to, say, supply disruptions, while
stimulating activity in the technologically intense service sectors and boosting gov-
ernment spending, have small spillover effects on the rest of the economy, primarily
because of reduced cost competitiveness. Yet, there is no evidence of Dutch disease.
Instead, we find evidence of a two-speed economy, with non-tradables growing at
a much faster pace than tradables. Our results suggest that traditional Dutch dis-
ease models with a fixed capital stock and exogenous labor supply do not provide
a convincing explanation for how petroleum wealth affects a resource rich economy
when there are productivity spillovers between sectors.