dc.contributor.author | Andersen, Jørgen Juel | |
dc.contributor.author | Aslaksen, Silje | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2012-10-30T11:44:30Z | |
dc.date.available | 2012-10-30T11:44:30Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2013 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1872-6089 (e-utg) | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11250/93724 | |
dc.description | This is the authors’ final, accepted and refereed manuscript to the article | no_NO |
dc.description.abstract | Political economy theories on the natural resource curse predict that natural resource
wealth is a determining factor for the length of time political leaderships remain in o¢ ce.
Whether resource wealth leads to longer or shorter durations in political o¢ ce depends
on the political incentives created by the natural resources, which in turn depend on the
types of institutions and natural resource. Exploiting a sample of more than 600 political
leadership durations in up to 152 countries, we nd that both institutions and resource
types matter for the e¤ect that natural resource wealth has on political survival: (i) wealth
derived from natural resources a¤ects political survival in intermediate and autocratic, but
not in democratic, polities; and (ii) while oil and non-lootable diamonds are associated with
positive e¤ects on the duration in political o¢ ce, minerals are associated with negative
duration e¤ects. | no_NO |
dc.language.iso | eng | no_NO |
dc.publisher | Elsevier | no_NO |
dc.subject | political survival | no_NO |
dc.subject | oil | no_NO |
dc.subject | natural resources | no_NO |
dc.subject | institutions | no_NO |
dc.title | Oil and political survival | no_NO |
dc.type | Journal article | no_NO |
dc.type | Peer reviewed | no_NO |
dc.source.pagenumber | 89-106 | no_NO |
dc.source.volume | 100 | no_NO |
dc.source.journal | Journal of Development Economics | no_NO |
dc.source.issue | 1 | no_NO |
dc.identifier.doi | http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2012.08.008 | |