Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorAndersen, Jørgen Juel
dc.contributor.authorAslaksen, Silje
dc.date.accessioned2012-10-30T11:44:30Z
dc.date.available2012-10-30T11:44:30Z
dc.date.issued2013
dc.identifier.issn1872-6089
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/93724
dc.descriptionThis is the authors’ final, accepted and refereed manuscript to the articleno_NO
dc.description.abstractPolitical economy theories on the “natural resource curse” predict that natural resource wealth is a determining factor for the length of time political leaderships remain in office. Whether resource wealth leads to longer or shorter durations in political office depends on the political incentives created by the natural resources, which in turn depend on the types of institutions and natural resource. Exploiting a sample of more than 600 political leadership durations in up to 152 countries, we find that both institutions and resource types matter for the effect that natural resource wealth has on political survival: (i) wealth derived from natural resources affects political survival in intermediate and autocratic, but not in democratic, polities; and (ii) while oil and non-lootable diamonds are associated with positive effects on the duration in political office, minerals are associated with negative duration effects.no_NO
dc.language.isoengno_NO
dc.publisherElsevierno_NO
dc.subjectpolitical survivalno_NO
dc.subjectoilno_NO
dc.subjectnatural resourcesno_NO
dc.subjectinstitutionsno_NO
dc.titleOil and political survivalno_NO
dc.typeJournal articleno_NO
dc.typePeer reviewedno_NO
dc.source.pagenumber89-106no_NO
dc.source.volume100no_NO
dc.source.journalJournal of Development Economicsno_NO
dc.source.issue1no_NO
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jdeveco.2012.08.008


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record