Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKidwel, Roland E.
dc.contributor.authorNygaard, Arne
dc.date.accessioned2012-09-03T09:13:34Z
dc.date.available2012-09-03T09:13:34Z
dc.date.issued2010
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/95410
dc.description.abstractDrawing on various theoretical streams, including organizational deviance, we propose that a franchisor cannot assess and control opportunism without comparative information from plural form contractual arrangements provided by both franchisee relationships and operating its own units. Moving beyond dyadic perspectives, our strategic deviance model suggests why franchisors accept deviant behavior that results from vertical and horizontal agency problems. The plural form provides benchmark information to the franchisor that curbs even greater levels of costly shirking and free riding behaviors. Thus, company manager and franchisee opportunism is managed through self enforcing social control, tournaments in internal quasi-markets and social comparison mechanisms.no_NO
dc.language.isoengno_NO
dc.publisherBI Norwegian Business Schoolno_NO
dc.relation.ispartofseriesCCGR Working Paper;1/2010
dc.subjectdeviant behaviorno_NO
dc.subjectshirkingno_NO
dc.subjectfree ridingno_NO
dc.subjectplural modelno_NO
dc.subjectmulti-agent theoryno_NO
dc.titleThe Dual-Agency Problem Reconsidered: A Strategic Deviance Perspective on the Franchise Form of Organizingno_NO
dc.typeWorking paperno_NO
dc.source.pagenumber37 pagesno_NO


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record