Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGottschalk, Petter
dc.contributor.authorGunnesdal, Lars
dc.date.accessioned2017-11-13T13:26:23Z
dc.date.available2017-11-13T13:26:23Z
dc.date.created2017-10-23T16:20:41Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifier.citationInternational Journal of Criminal Justice Sciences. 2017, 12 (2), 224-236.
dc.identifier.issn0973-5089
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/2465849
dc.description.abstractExpert elicitation is a research method designed to make estimations in areas where we have no knowledge, only indicators and experiences. By systematic interviews of experts, we tried to estimate the magnitude of white-collar crime in Norway. On our way to a final answer, we were faced with a number of obstacles in our research design. This article reports from our research journey by communicating our learning from methodological challenges when applying expert elicitation to estimate the size of an iceberg based on knowledge about the tip of the iceberg. In particular, participation refusals and response confusions are discussed. This article presents results from a study where we engaged an expert panel to estimate a number of parameters that can determine the total amount of money lost yearly because of white-collar crime.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.titleExpert elicitation to estimate the size of an iceberg based on the tip: Some methodological challenges in determining the magnitude of white-collar crime
dc.typePeer reviewed
dc.typeJournal article
dc.description.versionpublishedVersion
dc.source.pagenumber224-236
dc.source.volume12
dc.source.journalInternational Journal of Criminal Justice Sciences
dc.source.issue2
dc.identifier.cristin1506977
cristin.unitcode158,4,0,0
cristin.unitnameInstitutt for ledelse og organisasjon
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record