• norsk
    • English
  • English 
    • norsk
    • English
  • Login
View Item 
  •   Home
  • Handelshøyskolen BI
  • Publikasjoner fra CRIStin - BI
  • View Item
  •   Home
  • Handelshøyskolen BI
  • Publikasjoner fra CRIStin - BI
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Honesty in projects

Kvalnes, Øyvind
Journal article, Peer reviewed
Thumbnail
View/Open
Final author version (115.5Kb)
URI
http://hdl.handle.net/11250/218077
Date
2014
Metadata
Show full item record
Collections
  • Publikasjoner fra CRIStin - BI [636]
  • Scientific articles [1722]
Original version
International Journal of Managing Projects in Business 2014, 7(4):590-600   10.1108/IJMPB-07-2013-0027
Abstract
Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to explore how the concept of honesty can shed light on

misreporting issues in projects. Research on honesty can be useful for practitioners and researchers in

project management, in order to understand and counter the withholding and distortion of relevant

information from projects. In moral psychology, dishonesty is often explained as a result of moral

neutralization. The paper provides an account of how neutralization can lead to dishonesty in projects.

Design/methodology/approach – The current study is based on a literature review of research on

misreporting and dishonesty in projects, and of relevant generic studies of honesty.

Findings – The author concludes that the phenomenon of moral neutralization can explain dishonesty

and misreporting in projects. Honesty can be encouraged by identifying attempts at moral neutralization,

and rendering them unacceptable. At the core of this position is the view that the level of honesty

amongst project members is most adequately understood and explained from a circumstance rather than

a character approach.

Research limitations/implications – The paper is based on a literature review, and needs to be

supported by further empirical studies within project management.

Practical implications – The suggested primacy of a circumstance approach to honesty implies that

project practitioners should be aware of the phenomenon of moral neutralization. Even people of good

moral character can become involved in neutralization, in order to render misreporting acceptable.

The central practical challenge can thus be to recognize tendencies of neutralization in one’s own and

other people’s moral reasoning.

Originality/value – The main contribution of this paper is to introduce the concept of honesty in

general, and the concept of moral neutralization in particular, to project management research and

practice. The paper also suggests concrete ways to redirect attention from character to circumstances,

based on more general research findings in social and moral psychology.

Keywords Project management, Character, Virtue ethics, Honesty, Moral psychology

Paper type Research paper
Description
This is the author’s accepted, refereed and final manuscript to the article. Publisher's version is available at http://www.emeraldinsight.com/
Publisher
Emerald
Journal
International Journal of Managing Projects in Business

Contact Us | Send Feedback

Privacy policy
DSpace software copyright © 2002-2019  DuraSpace

Service from  Unit
 

 

Browse

ArchiveCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsDocument TypesJournalsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsDocument TypesJournals

My Account

Login

Statistics

View Usage Statistics

Contact Us | Send Feedback

Privacy policy
DSpace software copyright © 2002-2019  DuraSpace

Service from  Unit