Omstilling og utvikling i norske kommuner : mye skrik og lite ull?
Research report
Permanent lenke
http://hdl.handle.net/11250/94230Utgivelsesdato
2007Metadata
Vis full innførselSamlinger
- Research Reports [141]
Sammendrag
Local authorities in Norway countries face a number of challenges. Municipalities
are often seen as old-fashioned and inefficient. Recent exposures of corruption
have damaged their reputation further. Local government is not perceived as an
attractive place of work. This is serious because shares of elderly will increase
significantly from 2010, particularly in peripheral districts. Demographics means
that local government will need more employees to meet the increasing demand for
health care services and old-age care. Serious quality problems have been observed
in education and old-age care. At the same time, a better-educated public wants
better information, more influence and better quality public services. Finally, many
observers claim that the local democracy is in trouble. Participation in local
elections and political parties is declining, and elected representatives believe they
have limited scope for pursuing their political agendas.
This report addresses governance reforms initiated by local governments during the
last 10-15 years. Initiatives include reforms of local democracy and relations to
citizenry, new procedures for internal governance, attempts to improve user
satisfaction, use of quasi-markets and competitive tendering, and the establishment
of inter-municipal companies to exploit economies of scale.
The crux of the analysis is whether these initiatives have improved performance.
The report reviews a large number of government commission reports, consultancy
evaluations and research papers. We suggest that concerns about the alleged
decline of local democracy have been exaggerated. Internal governance procedures
have been developed, but it is hard to see significant improvements in actual
performance. Relations with service users have not changed much, and the use of
competitive tendering is limited to some infrastructure services. The use of intermunicipal
companies has increased a lot, but cost efficiency and political control
appear to suffer from dispersed ownership.