Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorGeys, Benny
dc.date.accessioned2013-04-11T09:19:55Z
dc.date.available2013-12-01T00:00:24Z
dc.date.issued2012
dc.identifier.issn1744-8697 (e-utg)
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/93868
dc.descriptionThis is the author’s final, accepted and refereed manuscript to the articleno_NO
dc.description.abstractIn their discussion of my article, Dag Wollebaek and Per Selle agree with my central point that changes in the institutional and socio-political context are likely to affect the engagement-values relation over time, and that more theoretical and empirical research is required to better understand the underlying connections. They then highlight a number of weaknesses in my empirical analysis. First, they criticise the operationalization of the isolated-connected distinction I borrow from Paxton (2002, 2007), and point to the scope of engagement as a way of ‘keeping it simple’. Second, they express disbelief in the apparent strength of the correlations at the individual level compared to the aggregate level in my analysis, and assert that an ‘organizational society of broad scope’ is primary. In this rejoinder, I briefly discuss both comments.no_NO
dc.language.isoengno_NO
dc.publisherRoutledgeno_NO
dc.subjectvoluntary associationsno_NO
dc.subjectgeneralized trustno_NO
dc.subjectlongitudinal analysisno_NO
dc.titleLimitations of the KISS principle and a strong organizational society: a rejoinder to Wollebaek and Selleno_NO
dc.typeJournal articleno_NO
dc.typePeer reviewedno_NO
dc.source.pagenumber201-206no_NO
dc.source.volume8no_NO
dc.source.journalJournal of Civil Societyno_NO
dc.source.issue2no_NO
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17448689.2012.686753


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel