dc.contributor.author | Isaksen, Scott G. | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-09-05T09:51:24Z | |
dc.date.available | 2023-09-05T09:51:24Z | |
dc.date.created | 2023-02-21T19:00:39Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2022 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Creativity Research Journal. 2022, . | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 1040-0419 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/11250/3087442 | |
dc.description.abstract | This article was stimulated by a review of instruments assessing creative and innovative social environments seventeen years ago. This stands alone as the only published, comprehensive, comparative review of multiple instruments aimed at this conceptual space. Although this review provided an important contribution to the literature, there are a number of critical conceptual issues that should be considered when reviewing assessments of this kind. This article raises these issues and points out their relevance when developing, evaluating, or applying instruments – and applies these issues to the instruments included in the review. Further, the aim was also to provide updated information on the Situational Outlook Questionnaire, as there were a few potential misunderstandings contained within the Mathisen and Einarsen review. Finally, numerous criteria are offered for those creating or choosing to use measures of the work environment, climate, or culture that promotes organizational creativity and innovation. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | eng | en_US |
dc.publisher | Taylor & Francis | en_US |
dc.rights | Navngivelse-Ikkekommersiell 4.0 Internasjonal | * |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/deed.no | * |
dc.subject | Creative Climate | en_US |
dc.subject | Innovative Climate | en_US |
dc.subject | Work Environment for Creativity and Innovation | en_US |
dc.title | Assessing the Work Environment for Creativity and Innovation: Building on Mathisen and Einarsen’s Review (2004) | en_US |
dc.title.alternative | Assessing the Work Environment for Creativity and Innovation: Building on Mathisen and Einarsen’s Review (2004) | en_US |
dc.type | Peer reviewed | en_US |
dc.type | Journal article | en_US |
dc.description.version | acceptedVersion | en_US |
dc.rights.holder | Taylor & Francis | en_US |
dc.source.pagenumber | 27 | en_US |
dc.source.volume | 35 | en_US |
dc.source.journal | Creativity Research Journal | en_US |
dc.source.issue | 2 | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1080/10400419.2022.2112837 | |
dc.identifier.cristin | 2127995 | |
cristin.ispublished | true | |
cristin.fulltext | postprint | |
cristin.qualitycode | 1 | |