Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorTodd, Jennifer
dc.contributor.authorSwami, Viren
dc.contributor.authorAspell, Jane E.
dc.contributor.authorFurnham, Adrian
dc.contributor.authorHorne, George
dc.contributor.authorStieger, Stefan
dc.date.accessioned2023-01-23T13:00:55Z
dc.date.available2023-01-23T13:00:55Z
dc.date.created2022-12-19T08:32:57Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.citationPLOS ONE. 2022, 17 (12), .en_US
dc.identifier.issn1932-6203
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3045360
dc.description.abstractInteroception refers to the processing of stimuli originating within the body and is widely considered a multidimensional construct. However, there remains a lack of consensus regarding the definition and measurement of the subjective, self-reported component, referred to here as interoceptive sensibility. As a contribution to knowledge on the topic, we sought to examine the construct commonality and distinguishability of seven self-report measures of interoceptive sensibility using Item Pool Visualisation (IPV), an illustrative method that locates item pools from within the same dataset and illustrates these in the form of nested radar charts. Adults from the United Kingdom (N = 802) completed seven measures of interoceptive sensibility, and the data were subjected to IPV. Results demonstrated that, of the included measures, the Multidimensional Assessment of Interoceptive Awareness-2 provided the closest and most precise measurement of the core interoceptive sensibility construct (i.e., core of the entire investigated item pool). The Body Awareness Questionnaire and the Private Body Consciousness Scale were also centrally located measures, while the Body Perception Questionnaire and the Body Responsiveness Scale appear to tap more distal aspects of the core construct. We discuss implications for interpreting complicated data patterns using measures of interoceptive sensibility and, more generally, for measuring the construct of interoceptive sensibility.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherPLOS ONEen_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.subjectcrisis-induced learningen_US
dc.subjectresilience engineeringen_US
dc.subjectcase studiesen_US
dc.subjectadaptive capacityen_US
dc.titleAre some interoceptive sensibility components more central than others? Using item pool visualisation to understand the psychometric representation of interoceptionen_US
dc.title.alternativeAre some interoceptive sensibility components more central than others? Using item pool visualisation to understand the psychometric representation of interoceptionen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.source.pagenumber23en_US
dc.source.volume17en_US
dc.source.journalPLOS ONEen_US
dc.source.issue12en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1371/journal.pone.0277894
dc.identifier.cristin2094911
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal