Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorZhang, Tong
dc.date.accessioned2022-09-26T07:24:57Z
dc.date.available2022-09-26T07:24:57Z
dc.date.created2022-08-10T13:42:07Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.citationA Journal of Knowledge, Culture and Policy. 2022, Online First 21 June 2022en_US
dc.identifier.issn0269-1728
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3021156
dc.description.abstractCritical realism, championed by its proponents as the most promising post-positivist social science paradigm, has gained significant influence in the last few decades. This paper provides a critical evaluation of the critical realism movement in the hope of facilitating more fruitful dialogues between its proponents and rivalling schools of sociologists. Two concerns are raised about contemporary critical realism. First, critical realism is not the only philosophical school against positivism and not necessarily the best. Second, critical realists exaggerate the importance of critical realism to social science and conflate philosophy of science with sociological theories.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherTaylor & Francis Onlineen_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.subjectCritical realismen_US
dc.subjectDuhem- Quine thesisen_US
dc.subjectinterpretivismen_US
dc.titleCritical Realism: A Critical Evaluationen_US
dc.title.alternativeCritical Realism: A Critical Evaluationen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holderTaylor & Francis Onlineen_US
dc.source.journalSocial Epistemologyen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/02691728.2022.2080127
dc.identifier.cristin2042230
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal