Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorLandazuri-Tveteraas, Ursula
dc.contributor.authorOglend, Atle
dc.contributor.authorSteen, Marie
dc.contributor.authorStraume, Hans-Martin
dc.date.accessioned2022-02-14T11:26:41Z
dc.date.available2022-02-14T11:26:41Z
dc.date.created2020-12-16T09:39:51Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.citationAquaculture Economics & Management, 2021, 25:2, 159-176,en_US
dc.identifier.issn1365-7305
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/2978728
dc.description.abstractThis study investigates potential economic reasons why the production of trout is maintained in Norway by analyzing prices and production for Norwegian Atlantic salmon and trout. The species Atlantic salmon dominates the global salmon market, but its two largest producers, Norway and Chile also farm in sea pens significant quantities of large rainbow trout (as opposed to portion-sized Rainbow trout farmed in freshwaters in other parts of the World, e.g., Iran, Peru, Turkey, and others). Suggesting that these trout have some attributes that make it a useful complement to Atlantic salmon. We investigate development in supply volumes of these species and conduct a cointegration analysis using monthly prices from 2000 to 2018. The results show that the markets for fresh and frozen rainbow trout are tightly integrated with fresh Atlantic salmon, and, where the latter is a price leader. This means that many consumers consider the two products as substitutes, with no clear preferences. There is no apparent productivity argument for the continued production of rainbow trout vis-à-vis Atlantic salmon. However, there may exist a fringe of consumers that prefer its characteristics, motivating firms to maintain its production as a means of diversification.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherTaylor and Francisen_US
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleSalmon trout, the forgotten cousin?en_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.description.versionacceptedVersionen_US
dc.source.pagenumber157-176en_US
dc.source.volume25en_US
dc.source.journalAquaculture Economics & Managementen_US
dc.source.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1080/13657305.2020.1857469
dc.identifier.cristin1860349
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextpostprint
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal