Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorPollock, Kevin
dc.contributor.authorSteen, Riana
dc.date.accessioned2022-01-04T14:15:16Z
dc.date.available2022-01-04T14:15:16Z
dc.date.created2020-11-05T11:08:38Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.citationRisk, Hazards & Crisis in Public Policy, 2021, 12 (1),73-109.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1944-4079
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/2836022
dc.description.abstractThe Total Defence (TD) concept aims to provide an effective crisis response structure by increasing societal resilience. However, the complexity of its structure regarding resource mobilisation and management process highlights the need for a complexity-oriented approach in the operationalising of TD. We study the application of TD during the COVID19 crisis and explore what makes the TD a viable system with resilience capabilities in the face the crisis. We apply the Viable Systems Model as a methodology to compare the viability of the UK and Norwegian TD systems, both of which use systems networks to achieve resilience, and contrast the different outcomes of each country. Our analysis highlights that: Managing the complexity of the TDS requires that all of the involved agencies proactively adopt a transparent approach to a joint decision making. This demands a wide range of sources of innovative solutions at different levels. Joint exercises, developed by the responsible agencies, enhance mutual understating of roles and responsibilities and crisis response structure. This calls for institutionalised support to dedicate resources. To avoid communications challenges, involved agencies in the TDS need to adopt an open messaging strategy, highlighting how to deal with uncertainties in communicating of decisions and action.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherWileyen_US
dc.titleTotal Defence Resilience: viable or not during COVID-19? A comparative study of Norway and the UK.en_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.description.versionacceptedVersionen_US
dc.source.pagenumber73-109en_US
dc.source.volume12en_US
dc.source.journalRisk, Hazards & Crisis in Public Policyen_US
dc.source.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/rhc3.12207
dc.identifier.cristin1845192
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextpostprint
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel