Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorRigolini, Alessandra
dc.contributor.authorHuse, Morten
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-09T10:44:07Z
dc.date.available2020-06-09T10:44:07Z
dc.date.created2019-12-27T10:15:30Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.citationJ Bus Ethics (2019).en_US
dc.identifier.issn0167-4544
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/2657340
dc.description.abstractWe show unintended consequences of quota regulations to get women on boards. Board members may have diferent characteristics, and even among women, there are variations. We assume that the characteristics of the board members have an infuence on their contributions to boards, to businesses as well as to society. In this paper, we argue that diferent types of societal pressure to get women on boards have an infuence on the social capital characteristics of the women getting multiple board memberships. The paper is drawing on institutional theory and social capital theory, and we distinguish between mimetic, normative, and coercive types of pressure. Through a cluster analysis of 58 Italian “golden skirts”, we show that diferent types of societal pressure may lead to diferences in social capital characteristics. The study has implications for the ongoing international debate about women and diversity on boards, and we propose developing a pressure theory for getting women on boards.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherSpringeren_US
dc.titleWomen and multiple board memberships: Social capital and institutional pressureen_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.description.versionacceptedVersionen_US
dc.source.pagenumber1-17en_US
dc.source.journalJournal of Business Ethicsen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s10551-019-04313-6
dc.identifier.cristin1763918
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextpostprint
cristin.qualitycode2


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel