• norsk
    • English
  • English 
    • norsk
    • English
  • Login
View Item 
  •   Home
  • Handelshøyskolen BI
  • Publikasjoner fra CRIStin - BI
  • View Item
  •   Home
  • Handelshøyskolen BI
  • Publikasjoner fra CRIStin - BI
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Counterfeit brand logos: On the importance of first and last letters of a brand name

Pathak, Abhishek; Velasco, Carlos; Calvert, Gemma
Journal article, Peer reviewed
Submitted version
Thumbnail
View/Open
Paper+EJM_cv.pdf (1.141Mb)
URI
http://hdl.handle.net/11250/2603038
Date
2019
Metadata
Show full item record
Collections
  • Publikasjoner fra CRIStin - BI [630]
  • Scientific articles [1334]
Original version
European Journal of Marketing. 2019.   10.1108/EJM-09-2017-0586
Abstract
Purpose

Counterfeiting is a menace in the emerging markets and many successful brands are falling prey to it. Counterfeit brands not only deceive consumers but also fuel a demand for lower priced replicas, both of which can devalue the bona-fide brand. But can consumers accurately identify a counterfeit logo? This paper aims to explore this question and examines the accuracy and speed with which a consumer can identify a counterfeit (vs original) logo.

Design/methodology/approach

Seven popular brand logos were altered by transposing and substituting the first and last letters of the logotypes. Consumers then classified the logos as counterfeit (vs original) across two experiments.

Findings

Participants were faster and more accurate in identifying a counterfeit logo when the first letter (vs last letter) of a logotype was manipulated, thus revealing last letter manipulations of a brand’s logotype to be more deceptive.

Research limitations/implications

This paper comments only on the manipulation of logotypes but not of logo symbols. Similarly, findings may not be generalizable across languages which are read from right to left.

Practical implications

Counterfeit trade is already a multibillion dollar industry. Understanding the key perceptual differentiators between a counterfeit (vs original) logo can be insightful for both consumers and firms alike.

Originality/value

Research available on objective measures of similarities (vs dissimilarities) between counterfeit (vs original) brand logos is limited. This paper contributes by examining the ability of consumers to discriminate between counterfeit (vs original) logos at different levels of visual similarity.
Publisher
Emerald
Journal
European Journal of Marketing

Contact Us | Send Feedback

Privacy policy
DSpace software copyright © 2002-2019  DuraSpace

Service from  Unit
 

 

Browse

ArchiveCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsDocument TypesJournalsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsDocument TypesJournals

My Account

Login

Statistics

View Usage Statistics

Contact Us | Send Feedback

Privacy policy
DSpace software copyright © 2002-2019  DuraSpace

Service from  Unit