Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorGottschalk, Petter
dc.date.accessioned2019-01-28T12:33:16Z
dc.date.available2019-01-28T12:33:16Z
dc.date.created2018-12-29T07:31:33Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier.citationJournal of International Doctoral Research. 2018, 7 (1), 79-99.nb_NO
dc.identifier.issn2328-0832
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/2582629
dc.descriptionhttps://docs.wixstatic.com/ugd/eba26f_e899d453e0ce4b4abb13dd3df82197b9.pdfnb_NO
dc.description.abstractFraud examiners from global accounting firms and local law firms are hired by private and public organizations to investigate suspicion of financial crime committed by white-collar offenders. Reports of the investigations are the result of work that provides insight into both fraudulent behavior as well as examination performance. Unfortunately, most reports are kept confidential. In this article, a publicly available report is reviewed. Evidence of convenience is found in motive, opportunity and willingness with regard to deviant behavior in organizational contexts. Furthermore, investigation strategies, investigation processes and investigation result are reviewed. A later court verdict is presented, which puts the fraud examination in perspective.nb_NO
dc.language.isoengnb_NO
dc.titleApplication of convenience theory and evaluation of Fraud examination: The case of the Deloitte investigation of the Sheriff's Office in Philadelphianb_NO
dc.typeJournal articlenb_NO
dc.typePeer reviewednb_NO
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionnb_NO
dc.source.pagenumber79-99nb_NO
dc.source.volume7nb_NO
dc.source.journalJournal of International Doctoral Researchnb_NO
dc.source.issue1nb_NO
dc.identifier.cristin1647701
cristin.unitcode158,4,0,0
cristin.unitnameInstitutt for ledelse og organisasjon
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel