Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorRusso, Alessia
dc.contributor.authorHarstad, Bård Gjul
dc.contributor.authorLancia, Francesco
dc.date.accessioned2019-01-21T08:51:12Z
dc.date.available2019-01-21T08:51:12Z
dc.date.created2019-01-07T09:42:03Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.citationJournal of the European Economic Association. 2019nb_NO
dc.identifier.issn1542-4766
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/2581388
dc.description.abstractThis paper analyzes a game in which countries repeatedly make emission and technology investment decisions. We derive the best equilibrium, that is, the Pareto-optimal subgame-perfect equilibrium, when countries are insufficiently patient for folk theorems to be relevant. Relative to the first best, the best equilibrium requires countries to overinvest in technologies that are green, that is, strategic substitutes for polluting, but to underinvest in adaptation and brown technologies, that is, strategic complements to polluting. Technological transfers and spillovers might discourage investments but can be necessary to motivate compliance with emissions when countries are heterogeneousnb_NO
dc.language.isoengnb_NO
dc.publisherOxfordnb_NO
dc.titleCompliance Technology and Self-enforcing Agreementsnb_NO
dc.typeJournal articlenb_NO
dc.typePeer reviewednb_NO
dc.description.versionacceptedVersionnb_NO
dc.source.volume17nb_NO
dc.source.journalJournal of the European Economic Associationnb_NO
dc.source.issue1nb_NO
dc.identifier.cristin1651208
cristin.unitcode158,3,0,0
cristin.unitnameInstitutt for samfunnsøkonomi
cristin.ispublishedfalse
cristin.fulltextpostprint
cristin.qualitycode2


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel