Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorFieseler, Christian
dc.contributor.authorBucher, Eliane
dc.contributor.authorHoffmann, Christian Pieter
dc.date.accessioned2018-11-09T13:19:53Z
dc.date.available2018-11-09T13:19:53Z
dc.date.created2017-06-27T13:55:45Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Business Ethics. 2017 June 21.nb_NO
dc.identifier.issn0167-4544
dc.identifier.issn1573-0697
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/2571849
dc.description.abstractBased on a qualitative survey among 203 US workers active on the microwork platform Amazon Mechanical Turk, we analyze potential biases embedded in the institutional setting provided by on-demand crowdworking platforms and their effect on perceived workplace fairness. We explore the triadic relationship between employers, workers, and platform providers, focusing on the power of platform providers to design settings and processes that affect workers’ fairness perceptions. Our focus is on workers’ awareness of the new institutional setting, frames applied to the mediating platform, and a differentiated analysis of distinct fairness dimensions.nb_NO
dc.language.isoengnb_NO
dc.publisherSpringer
dc.titleUnfairness by Design? The Perceived Fairness of Digital Labor on Crowdworking Platformsnb_NO
dc.typeJournal articlenb_NO
dc.typePeer reviewednb_NO
dc.description.versionacceptedVersionnb_NO
dc.source.pagenumber1-19nb_NO
dc.source.journalJournal of Business Ethicsnb_NO
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s10551-017-3607-2
dc.identifier.cristin1479224
dc.relation.projectNorges forskningsråd: 247725nb_NO
dc.description.localcode2, Forfatterversjonnb_NO
cristin.unitcode158,9,0,0
cristin.unitnameInstitutt for kommunikasjon og kultur
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextpostprint
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel