Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorBurkart, Mike
dc.contributor.authorMiglietta, Salvatore
dc.contributor.authorØstergaard, Charlotte
dc.date.accessioned2018-03-06T11:55:36Z
dc.date.available2018-03-06T11:55:36Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/2488877
dc.description.abstractWe study how owners trade off the costs and benefits of establishing a board in a historical setting, where boards are optional and authority over corporate decisions can be freely allocated across the general meeting, the board, and management. We find that large owners and boards are substitutes and that boards exist in firms most prone to collective action problems. Boards monitor, advise, and mediate among shareholders, and these different roles entail different allocations of authority. Boards also arise to balance the need for small shareholder protection with the need to curb managerial discretion.nb_NO
dc.language.isoengnb_NO
dc.publisherBI Norwegian Business Schoolnb_NO
dc.relation.ispartofseriesCCGR Working Paper;1/2017
dc.titleWhy Do Boards Exist? Governance in the Absence of Corporate Lawnb_NO
dc.typeWorking papernb_NO
dc.source.pagenumber64nb_NO


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel