Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorStenheim, Tonny
dc.contributor.authorMadsen, Dag Øivind
dc.date.accessioned2017-11-03T09:53:09Z
dc.date.available2017-11-03T09:53:09Z
dc.date.created2017-06-08T06:25:11Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifier.citationCorporate ownership & control. 2017, 14 (4-1), 289-300.nb_NO
dc.identifier.issn1727-9232
dc.identifier.issn1810-3057
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/2463903
dc.descriptionThis is an Open Access journal available from http://www.virtusinterpress.orgnb_NO
dc.description.abstractThis paper investigates the change in accounting quality w hen firms shift from a revenue - oriented historical cost accounting regime as Norwegian GAAP (NGAAP) to a balance - oriented fair value accounting regime as International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS). Previous studies have demonstrated mixed effects o n the accounting quality upon IFRS adoption. One possible reason is that the investigated domestic GAAP to a large extent has been adjusted to IFRS prior to IFRS adoption. This is not the case in NGAAP where IFRS adoption led to significant changes in the recognition and measurement rules. To investigate the change in accounting quality, the paper makes use of a panel design with 640 firm - year obserations from 2001 up to the financial crisis year 2008, including four years of pre - IFRS NGAAP observations and four years of IFRS - observations. The paper employs four commonly used approaches to investigate accounting quality: test of value relevance of net earnings and book values, accrual quality of net earnings, incidence of small positive net earnings and test of timely loss recognition. The paper demonstrates that the adoption of IFRS increases the relevance accounting information has for valuation purposes. IFRS requires recognition of intangible assets and off - balance sheet liabilities not allowed under NGAA P. Moreover, IFRS allows the use of fair value to a larger extent than NGAAP. The paper also demonstrates that NGAAP leads to timelier recognition of losses than IFRS. This supports the notion that historical cost accounting, which is the basic accounting principle under NGAAP, provides more conservative accounting numbers. Overall, this suggests that IFRS provides information more useful for valuation purposes, but to a lesser extent stewardship purposes which generally favours conservatism. NGAAP on the o ther hand, provides information less relevant for valuation purposes, but more relevant for stewardship purposes.nb_NO
dc.language.isoengnb_NO
dc.publisherVirtus Interpressnb_NO
dc.relation.urihttp://www.virtusinterpress.org/IMG/pdf/cocv14i4c1art11.pdf
dc.titleThe shift of Accounting Models and Accounting Quality: The case of Norwegian GAAPnb_NO
dc.typeJournal articlenb_NO
dc.typePeer reviewednb_NO
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionnb_NO
dc.source.pagenumber289-300nb_NO
dc.source.volume14nb_NO
dc.source.journalCorporate ownership and controlnb_NO
dc.source.issue4-1nb_NO
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.22495/cocv14i4c1art11
dc.identifier.cristin1474626
dc.description.localcode1,OAnb_NO
cristin.unitcode158,13,0,0
cristin.unitnameInstitutt for regnskap, revisjon og foretaksøkonomi
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel