Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorHeggedal, Tom-Reiel
dc.contributor.authorMoen, Espen R.
dc.contributor.authorPreugschat, Edgar
dc.date.accessioned2017-05-23T16:33:53Z
dc.date.available2017-05-23T16:33:53Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Economic Theory, 169(2017)May, 551-602nb_NO
dc.identifier.issn0022-0531
dc.identifier.issn1095-7235
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/2443376
dc.descriptionThe accepted and peer reviewed manuscript to the articlenb_NO
dc.description.abstractThis paper proposes an explicit model of spillovers through labor flows in a framework with search frictions. Firms can choose to innovate or to imitate by hiring a worker from a firm that has already innovated. We show that if innovating firms can commit to long-term wage contracts with their workers, productivity spillovers are fully internalized. If firms cannot commit to long-term wage contracts, there is too little innovation and too much imitation in equilibrium. Our model is tractable and allows us to analyze welfare effects of various policies in the limited commitment case. We find that subsidizing innovation and taxing imitation improves welfare. Moreover, allowing innovating firms to charge different forms of fees or rent out workers to imitating firms may also improve welfare. By contrast, non-pecuniary measures that reduce the efficiency of the search process, always reduce welfare.nb_NO
dc.language.isoengnb_NO
dc.publisherElseviernb_NO
dc.titleProductivity spillovers through labor mobility in search equilibriumnb_NO
dc.typeJournal articlenb_NO
dc.typePeer reviewednb_NO
dc.source.journalJournal of Economic Theorynb_NO
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jet.2017.03.003
dc.description.localcode2. Forfatterversjonnb_NO


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel