Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBoeri, Tito
dc.contributor.authorGaribaldi, Pietro
dc.contributor.authorMoen, Espen R.
dc.date.accessioned2017-03-15T09:28:08Z
dc.date.available2017-03-15T09:28:08Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Public Economics, 145(2017), 211-225nb_NO
dc.identifier.issn0047-2727
dc.identifier.issn1879-2316
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/2434137
dc.descriptionThe accepted and peer reviewed manuscript to the articlenb_NO
dc.description.abstractAll OECD countries have either legally mandated severance pay or compensations imposed by industry-level bargaining in case of employer initiated job separations. The paper shows that mandatory severance is optimal in presence of wage deferrals induced by workers' moral hazard. We also establish a link between optimal severance and efficiency of the legal system and characterize the effects of shifting the burden of proof from the employer to the worker. Quantitatively, the welfare effects of suboptimal severance payments vary in general equilibrium between 1 and 3 %. The model accounts also for two neglected features of the legislation. The first is the discretion of judges in declaring the nature, economic vs. disciplinary, of the layoff. The second feature regards the relationship between severance and tenure. Our theory gives necessary conditions under which optimal severance is increasing with tenure, as generally observed.nb_NO
dc.language.isoengnb_NO
dc.publisherElseviernb_NO
dc.titleInside severance paynb_NO
dc.typeJournal articlenb_NO
dc.typePeer reviewednb_NO
dc.source.journalJournal of Public Economicsnb_NO
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2016.11.003
dc.description.localcode2. Forfatterversjonnb_NO


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record