Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorOlson, Erik L.
dc.contributor.authorBiong, Harald
dc.date.accessioned2016-01-20T13:15:40Z
dc.date.available2016-01-20T13:15:40Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.identifier.citationInternational Journal of Business Continuity and Risk Management, 6(2015)1: 36-47nb_NO
dc.identifier.issn1758-2164
dc.identifier.issn1758-2172
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/2374349
dc.descriptionThis is the authors' accepted and refereed manuscript to the articlenb_NO
dc.description.abstractMore than three years after its highly publicized bankruptcy, Solyndra continues to resonate as an example of well-intentioned government policies gone wrong. This paper examines the Solyndra case using an institutional economics perspective to determine if the government’s relationship with the firm was optimal in achieving environmental and energy public policy goals while minimizing risk. The analysis reveals several government deviations from theory prescribed best practice, and illustrates opposing theoretical governance prescriptions for stimulating future technological innovation at the macro and micro levels.nb_NO
dc.language.isoengnb_NO
dc.publisherIndersciencenb_NO
dc.titleThe Solyndra case: an institutional economics perspective on the optimal role of government support for green technology developmentnb_NO
dc.typeJournal articlenb_NO
dc.typePeer reviewednb_NO
dc.source.journalInternational Journal of Business Continuity and Risk Managementnb_NO
dc.identifier.doi10.1504/IJBCRM.2015.070351
dc.description.localcode1, Forfatterversjonnb_NO


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record