Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorBiong, Harald
dc.contributor.authorSilkoset, Ragnhild
dc.date.accessioned2014-06-13T11:11:28Z
dc.date.available2014-06-13T11:11:28Z
dc.date.issued2014
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 22(2014)2: 169-184nb_NO
dc.identifier.issn1944-7175
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/196433
dc.descriptionThis is the authors’ final, accepted and refereed manuscript to the article. Publisher's homepage: http://www.mesharpe.com Availability of author's version is delayed until 18 months after first online publication. Unavailable until 2015-11-01. Publisher's policynb_NO
dc.description.abstractB2B branding research indicates that corporate brand equity investments will increase suppliers’ price premiums. In contrast, economics of information studies suggest suppliers’ price premiums to decrease with their brand investments. This study, building on economics of information, tests these contrasting perspectives empirically in a B2B-services context. The results show that suppliers’ corporate brand investments are ineffective in creating price premiums because brand investments and price premiums provide substituting information of unobservable quality. Furthermore, suppliers’ price premiums decrease with buyers’ willingness to punish sellers’ quality deception. In contrast, the suppliers’ price premiums increase with their provision of warranties and with their customers’ quality sensitiveness.nb_NO
dc.language.isoengnb_NO
dc.publisherM. E. Sharpe, Incnb_NO
dc.titleThe ineffectiveness of corporate brand investments in creating price premiumsnb_NO
dc.typeJournal articlenb_NO
dc.typePeer reviewednb_NO
dc.source.pagenumber169-184nb_NO
dc.source.volume22nb_NO
dc.source.journalJournal of Marketing Theory and Practicenb_NO
dc.source.issue2nb_NO
dc.identifier.doi10.2753/MTP1069-6679220211
dc.description.localcode1, Forfatterversjonnb_NO


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel