Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorFurnham, Adrian
dc.contributor.authorTreglown, Luke
dc.date.accessioned2023-06-26T12:49:48Z
dc.date.available2023-06-26T12:49:48Z
dc.date.created2021-05-12T15:48:02Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.citationPsychological Reports. 2021, .en_US
dc.identifier.issn0033-2941
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3073258
dc.description.abstractThis study focused on the idea that there are predictable differences between those individuals who opt for Scientific rather than the Commerce/Practitioner jobs and consulting assignments. A total of 2278 adults from a variety of occupations completed three validated questionnaires: the first assessed the behavioural tendency of an individual when one is exposed to stress and which could derail one’s business career (HDS: Hogan Development Survey); the second the values and preferences that indicate work motivation (MVPI: The Motives, Values and Preferences Inventory), and the third, seven bright-side personality factors (HPI: Hogan Personality Inventory). The MVPI measured interests in scientific and commercial/enterprising activities. Correlations, regressions and SEM indicated both similarities and differences in the relationship between personality traits and values. Bright-side personality traits accounted for more the variance for those interested in Science while dark-side traits accounted for more variance for those interested in the Commerce. The biggest difference occurred in Inquisitiveness (Curiosity, Openness to Experience) which was much higher for those interested in science. Implications for personnel selection, job-fit and promotion were discussed.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherSageen_US
dc.titleBright and Dark-Side Traits Associated With Interests in Commerce vs Science: Different Personality Profiles of the Scientist-Practitioneren_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.description.versionacceptedVersionen_US
dc.source.pagenumber20en_US
dc.source.volume125en_US
dc.source.journalPsychological Reportsen_US
dc.source.issue3en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/00332941211002134
dc.identifier.cristin1909773
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextpostprint
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel