Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorGottschalk, Petter
dc.date.accessioned2021-03-15T09:14:34Z
dc.date.available2021-03-15T09:14:34Z
dc.date.created2019-12-19T13:54:27Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.citationResearch Handbook on Transnational Crime. 2019en_US
dc.identifier.isbn9781784719432
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/2733316
dc.description.abstractPolicing cybercrime faces the challenge of determining the authenticity of messages by using judgment, intuition and deductive reasoning. A cybercrime investigation can be seen as composed of a number of discrete yet linked inquiry actions, including active undercover participation, which are directed towards the production of information about how and why crime occurred. Police investigators are concerned with the gathering of evidence leading to the arrest of offenders, as well as the collection and presentation of evidence and testimony for the purpose of obtaining a conviction. Prosecuting cybercrime involves several special considerations: jurisdiction, venue, statute of limitations, and juveniles. In terms of jurisdiction, several courts in the United States have indicated a willingness to assume that a crime took place in or affecting interstate business as long as there is evidence that the defendant used the Internet in connection with the offence.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherEdward Elgaren_US
dc.relation.ispartofResearch Handbook on Transnational Crime
dc.titlePolicing and prosecution of cybercrimeen_US
dc.typeChapteren_US
dc.description.versionacceptedVersionen_US
dc.source.pagenumber344-355en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.4337/9781784719449.00031
dc.identifier.cristin1763026
cristin.unitcode158,4,0,0
cristin.unitnameInstitutt for ledelse og organisasjon
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextpostprint
cristin.qualitycode2


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel