Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGrytten, Jostein Ivar
dc.contributor.authorMonkerud, Lars Christian
dc.contributor.authorHagen, Terje P.
dc.contributor.authorSørensen, Rune Jørgen
dc.contributor.authorEskild, Anne
dc.contributor.authorSkau, Irene
dc.date.accessioned2012-05-29T12:25:28Z
dc.date.available2012-05-29T12:25:28Z
dc.date.issued2011
dc.identifier.issn1472-6963
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/93580
dc.descriptionDette er et Open Access tidsskrift. Publisert versjon tilgjengelig på http://www.biomedcentral.com/no_NO
dc.description.abstractBackground: There has been a marked increase in the number of Caesarean sections in many countries during the last decades. In several countries, Caesarean sections are carried out in more than 20 per cent of births. These high Caesarean section rates give cause for concern, both from an economic and a medical perspective. A general opinion among epidemiologists is that the increase in the number of Caesarean sections during the last decade has been greater than could be expected in relation to medical risk factors. Therefore, other explanations must be sought. We studied one potential explanation; the effect that the increase in hospital revenue per bed during the period 1976-2005 has had on the Caesarean section rate in Norway. During this period, hospital revenue increased by about 260% (adjusted for inflation). Methods: The analyses were carried out using data from the Medical Birth Registry 1976-2005 from Norway. The data were merged with data about hospital revenue, which were obtained from Statistics Norway. The analyses were carried out using annual data from 46 hospitals. A fixed effect regression model was estimated. Relevant medical control variables were included. Results: The elasticity of the Caesarean section rate with respect to hospital revenue per bed was 0.13 (p < 0.05). This represents an increase in the Caesarean section rate from the basis year 1976 to the final year 2005 of about 35 per cent. Most of the variables measuring characteristics of the health status of the mother and child had the expected effects. Conclusion: The increase in hospital revenue explains only a small part of the increase in the Caesarean section rate in Norway during the last three decades. The increase in the Caesarean section rate is considerably greater than could be expected, based on the increase in hospital revenue alone. The strength of our study is that we have estimated a cause and effect relationship. This was done by using fixed effects for hospitals, a lagged revenue variable and by including an extensive set of control variables for the risk factors of the mother and the baby.no_NO
dc.language.isoengno_NO
dc.publisherBioMed Centralno_NO
dc.titleThe impact of hospital revenue on the increase in Caesarean sections in Norway. A panel data analysis of hospitals 1976-2005no_NO
dc.typeJournal articleno_NO
dc.typePeer reviewedno_NO
dc.source.pagenumber267-no_NO
dc.source.volume11no_NO
dc.source.journalBMC Health Services Researchno_NO
dc.source.issueOctoberno_NO
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/1472-6963-11-267


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record