The dual effects of job design on knowledge hiding: expanding job demands–resources theory to employee rational-choice behaviour
Peer reviewed, Journal article
Published version
Date
2024Metadata
Show full item recordCollections
Original version
10.1080/09585192.2024.2442081Abstract
Human resource management (HRM) literature often uses motivational theories to examine how job design motivates employees to manage newly established employee behaviours such as knowledge-hiding. However, the literature finds that whereas job-design characteristics reduce knowledge hiding, others unexpectedly encourage it. By integrating the cost-benefit analysis framework into the job demands–resources (JD–R) theory, we examine how job demands and job resources as two distinct types of job-design characteristics influence the expected costs and benefits of sharing solicited knowledge to affect knowledge hiding differently. In summary, we find that job demands encourage knowledge hiding, whereas job resources lower it. We contribute that job-design characteristics act as job demands or resources to affect knowledge hiding differently. Further, we explain the unexpected findings concerning why and how job-design characteristics – as job demands – encourage knowledge hiding by stimulating the expected costs but do not motivate employees to produce the expected benefits. In addition, by integrating the cost-benefit analysis framework into the JD–R theory, we contribute that job demands and resources affect the cost-benefit analyses, influencing employees’ rational choice behaviour. This integration considerably expands the JD–R theory’s application scope from employee well-being and performance to rational choice behaviours.
Publisher
Taylor & FrancisJournal
International Journal of Human Resource Management
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal
Related items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
IMP theory in light of process- and system theories
Olsen, Per Ingvar (Journal article; Peer reviewed, 2013)This paper compares and discusses IMP theory in relation to Process Theory and Systems Theory, and also relates it to the ANT. It contrasts and illuminates ontological and epistemological underpinnings, methodologies and ... -
Pecking Order Theory vs. Trade-Off Theory: How do financing decisions differ with firm size?
Kristiansen, Andrea Bruu; Seljelid, Marianne (Master thesis, 2018)This paper examines the capital structure decisions in Norwegian firms. Using a database containing extensive accounting data on Norwegian firms from 2006 to 2015, we test whether or not the pecking order theory and ... -
Do you have to be mad to believe in conspiracy theories? Personality disorders and conspiracy theories
Furnham, Adrian; Grover, Simmy (Journal article; Peer reviewed, 2021)This study explored the relationship between belief in conspiracy theories and the personality disorders. A sample of 475 British adults, aged around 30 years, completed measures of Belief in Conspiracy Theories (CTs) and ...