Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorGottschalk, Petter
dc.contributor.authorBenson, Michael L.
dc.date.accessioned2020-02-05T10:17:59Z
dc.date.available2020-02-05T10:17:59Z
dc.date.created2020-02-04T07:11:50Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.citationBritish Journal of Criminology. 2020, 1-21.nb_NO
dc.identifier.issn0007-0955
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/2639764
dc.description.abstractWe extend research on how corporations respond to scandals by examining the evolution of the accounts that are developed by corporate agents after a scandal becomes public. Guided by the theory of accounts and a recently developed perspective on crisis management, we examine how the accounts developed by 12 corporations caught up in highly publicized scandals changed from the time of initial exposure to the issuance of an investigative report. Our analysis shows that denial of wrongdoing in several cases is replaced by admission of wrongdoing and scapegoating, while obfuscation of wrongdoing is replaced by denial or acceptance of responsibility and scapegoating. We conclude with a discussion of the broader managerial and social implications of our analysis and how it furthers our understanding of the ability of corporations to weather serious scandals.nb_NO
dc.language.isoengnb_NO
dc.publisherOxfordnb_NO
dc.titleThe Evolution of Corporate Accounts of Scandals from Exposure to Investigationnb_NO
dc.typeJournal articlenb_NO
dc.typePeer reviewednb_NO
dc.description.versionacceptedVersionnb_NO
dc.source.pagenumber1-21nb_NO
dc.source.journalBritish Journal of Criminologynb_NO
dc.identifier.doi10.1093/bjc/azaa001
dc.identifier.cristin1790491
cristin.unitcode158,4,0,0
cristin.unitnameInstitutt for ledelse og organisasjon
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextpostprint
cristin.qualitycode2


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel