Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorŠkerlavaj, Miha
dc.contributor.authorConnelly, Catherine
dc.contributor.authorČerne, Matej
dc.contributor.authorDysvik, Anders
dc.date.accessioned2018-10-04T08:42:27Z
dc.date.available2018-10-04T08:42:27Z
dc.date.created2018-04-03T10:14:37Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Knowledge Management. 2018, 22 (7), 1489-1509.nb_NO
dc.identifier.issn1367-3270
dc.identifier.issn1758-7484
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/2566336
dc.description.abstractPurpose The belief that knowledge actually expands when it is shared has been deeply rooted in the mainstream knowledge management literature. Although many organizations and managers expect employees to share their knowledge with their colleagues, this does not always occur. This study aims to use the conservation of resources theory to explain why employees who experience greater time pressure are more likely to engage in knowledge hiding; it further considers how this behavior may be moderated by these employees’ prosocial motivation and perspective taking. Design/methodology/approach The paper uses quantitative multi-study research design as a combination of two-wave field study among 313 employees at an insurance company and a lab experimental study. Findings In the field study (Study 1), the authors find that perceived time pressure is positively related to knowledge hiding. Furthermore, this relationship is moderated by prosocial motivation: employees who perceive greater time pressure hide knowledge only when they are low in prosocial motivation. An experiment (Study 2) replicates these findings, and finds that perspective taking mediates the moderating effect of prosocial motivation on the relationship between time pressure and knowledge hiding. Research limitations/implications Despite its many contributions, the present research is also not without limitations. Study 1 was a cross-lagged sectional field study with self-reported data (although the two-wave design does help alleviate common-method-bias concerns). Causality concerns were further alleviated by using additional experimental study. Practical implications The paper highlights important reasons why people hide knowledge at work (because of experienced time pressure) as well as identifies two interlinked potential remedies (prosocial motivation and perspective taking) to reduce knowledge hiding. Originality/value This paper contributes to expanding nomological network of knowledge hiding construct by extending the set of known antecedents and contingencies.nb_NO
dc.language.isoengnb_NO
dc.publisherEmeraldnb_NO
dc.titleTell Me If You Can: Time Pressure, Prosocial Motivation, Perspective Taking, and Knowledge Hidingnb_NO
dc.title.alternativeTell Me If You Can: Time Pressure, Prosocial Motivation, Perspective Taking, and Knowledge Hidingnb_NO
dc.typeJournal articlenb_NO
dc.typePeer reviewednb_NO
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionnb_NO
dc.source.pagenumber1489-1509nb_NO
dc.source.volume22nb_NO
dc.source.journalJournal of Knowledge Managementnb_NO
dc.source.issue7nb_NO
dc.identifier.doi10.1108/JKM-05-2017-0179
dc.identifier.cristin1576678
dc.description.localcode1, Forfatterversjonnb_NO
cristin.unitcode158,4,0,0
cristin.unitnameInstitutt for ledelse og organisasjon
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record