Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorCanova, Fabio
dc.contributor.authorSahneh, Mehdi Hamidi
dc.date.accessioned2017-02-02T11:31:55Z
dc.date.available2017-02-02T11:31:55Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.identifier.issn1892-2198
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/2429259
dc.description.abstractNon-fundamentalness arises when observables do not contain enough information to recover the vector of structural shocks. Using Granger causality tests, the literature suggested that many small scale VAR models are non-fundamental and thus not useful for business cycle analysis. We show that causality tests are problematic when VAR variables are cross sectionally aggregated or proxy for non-observables. We provide an alternative testing procedure, illustrate its properties with a Monte Carlo exercise, and reexamine the properties of two prototypical VAR models.nb_NO
dc.language.isoengnb_NO
dc.publisherBI Norwegian Business Schoolnb_NO
dc.relation.ispartofseriesCAMP Working Paper Series;2/2016
dc.titleAre Small-Scale SVARs Useful for Business Cycle Analysis? Revisiting Non-Fundamentalnessnb_NO
dc.typeWorking papernb_NO
dc.source.pagenumber37nb_NO


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel