Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBrinkmann, Johannes
dc.contributor.authorLindemann, Beate
dc.contributor.authorSims, Ronald R.
dc.date.accessioned2016-12-07T09:51:51Z
dc.date.available2016-12-07T09:51:51Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Business Ethics, 139(2016)3: 619-631nb_NO
dc.identifier.issn0167-4544
dc.identifier.issn1573-0697
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/2424483
dc.descriptionThis is the accepted and refereed manuscript to the articlenb_NO
dc.description.abstractAfter a selective review of relevant literature about teaching business ethics, this paper builds on a summary of Fred Bird’s thoughts about the voicing of moral concerns provided in his book about moral muteness (1996). Socratic dialogue methodology (in the tradition of L. Nelson and G. Heckmann) is then presented and the use of this methodology is examined, for business ethics teaching in general, and for addressing our paper topic in particular. Three short form Socratic dialogues about the paper topic are summarized for illustration, together with preparation and debriefing suggestions for a Socratic dialogue unit as part of a business ethics course. In conclusion, Socratic dialogue design is related to the experiential learning approach, and characterized by a few basic traits, which imply both risks and opportunities for business ethics teaching.nb_NO
dc.language.isoengnb_NO
dc.publisherSpringernb_NO
dc.titleVoicing moral concerns: Yes, but how? The use of Socratic dialogue methodologynb_NO
dc.typeJournal articlenb_NO
dc.typePeer reviewednb_NO
dc.source.journalJournal of Business Ethicsnb_NO
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2655-8
dc.description.localcode1, Forfatterversjonnb_NO


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record