Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorLillegraven, Tor-Bøe
dc.contributor.authorWilberg, Erik
dc.date.accessioned2016-09-05T12:24:16Z
dc.date.available2016-09-05T12:24:16Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.identifier.citationNordicom Review, 37(2016)2: 1-16nb_NO
dc.identifier.issn1403-1108
dc.identifier.issn2001-5119
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/2404320
dc.descriptionThis is the final, accepted and refereed manuscript to the article publishednb_NO
dc.description.abstractTo survive in today’s increasingly complex business environments, firms must embrace strategic paradoxes: contradictory yet interrelated objectives that persist over time. This can be one of toughest of all leadership challenges, as managers must accept inconsistency and contradictions. In this article, we develop and empirically test a set of hypotheses related to ambidexterity, a key example of a paradoxical strategy. Through our analysis of data from a survey of executive leaders, we find a link between organizational ambidexterity and strategic planning, suggesting that the complexities of navigating in explorative ventures require more explicit strategy work than the old certainties of a legacy business. We identify and discuss inherent paradoxes and their implications for firm performance in 22 industry-specific strategies, where empirical industry data shows a pattern of conflict between explorative growth strategies and exploitative profit strategies. We argue that this is just one of the inherent paradoxes in the ambidexterity construct.nb_NO
dc.language.isoengnb_NO
dc.publisherNordicomnb_NO
dc.titleEditor, executive and entrepreneur: strategic paradoxes in the digital agenb_NO
dc.typeJournal articlenb_NO
dc.typePeer reviewednb_NO
dc.source.journalNordicom Reviewnb_NO
dc.description.localcode2. Forfatterversjonnb_NO


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel