Blar i Publikasjoner fra CRIStin - BI på forfatter "Andersson, Ulf"
-
Dealing with headquarters in the multinational corporation: A subsidiary perspective on organizing costs
Lunnan, Randi; Tomassen, Sverre; Andersson, Ulf; Benito, Gabriel R G (Journal article; Peer reviewed, 2019)This study examines how subsidiaries in multinational corporations (MNCs) experience interactions with corporate headquarters. We conceptualize such interactions in terms of organizing costs, focusing on two key types of ... -
Dynamic capability development in multinational enterprises: Reconciling routine reconfiguration between the headquarters and subsidiaries
Riviere, Monica; Bass, A. Erin; Andersson, Ulf (Journal article; Peer reviewed, 2020)Starting from the premise that firms need dynamic capabilities to adapt to changing environments, we discuss how multinational enterprises (MNEs) develop dynamic capabilities from internationalization. Unlike domestic firms ... -
Institutional antecedents of subsidiary external embeddedness: Coping with regulatory competitive constraints
Santangelo, Grazia D; Dellestrand, Henrik; Andersson, Ulf (Journal article; Peer reviewed, 2019)We investigate institutional antecedents to subsidiary external embeddedness and relate regulation constraining competition in local service sectors to subsidiary embeddedness with local partners in complementary sectors. ... -
Subsidiary upgrading and global value chain governance in the multinational enterprise
Ryan, Paul; Buciuni, Giulio; Giblin, Majella; Andersson, Ulf (Journal article; Peer reviewed, 2020)Upgrading and governance in global value chains (GVCs) have been understood mainly through studying the buyer–supplier transaction, where the supplier is typically an independent contractor from a developing economy. Little ... -
The IB/ IHRM interface: Exploring the potential of intersectional theorizing
Andersson, Ulf; Brewster, Chris; Minbaeva, Dana; Narula, Rajneesh; Wood, Geoffrey (Journal article; Peer reviewed, 2019)Although the core concepts underlying IB and IHRM provide a common lexicon and epistemology, this commonality is often more implicit than explicit. We highlight not only the common ground but also the lack of critical ...