Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorFagereng, Andreas
dc.contributor.authorGulbrandsen, Magnus A. H.
dc.contributor.authorHolm, Martin B.
dc.contributor.authorNatvik, Gisle J.
dc.date.accessioned2024-04-04T15:24:55Z
dc.date.available2024-04-04T15:24:55Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.identifier.issn2704-1980
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3124934
dc.description.abstractGrowth in household debt-to-income ratios can be attributed to nominal debt changes or mechanical “Fisher effects” from interest income and expenses, real income growth, and inflation. With microdata covering the universe of Norwegian households for more than 20 years, we decompose the importance of these channels for how debt-toincome ratios evolve over time and respond to monetary policy shocks. On average, debt changes outsize Fisher effects, and they are due to households who move. But among highly leveraged households, Fisher effects dominate. After interest rate hikes, debt changes and Fisher effects pull in opposite directions. The former dominate so that debt-to-income ratios fall. This pattern holds across sub-groups, even among highly indebted households. Hence, changes in borrowing and repayment dominate mechanical effects via nominal income growth in the transmission of monetary policy shocks to debt-to-income ratios.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherBI Norwegian Business Schoolen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesHOFIMAR Working Paper Series;5/2023
dc.subjectMonetary Policyen_US
dc.subjectHousehold Debten_US
dc.titleHow Does Monetary Policy Affect Household Indebtedness?en_US
dc.typeWorking paperen_US
dc.source.pagenumber29en_US


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel